The poster presentations went far
beyond what I expected and turned out to be a great cap to the semesters work
and stimulated a great discussion. I am really looking forward to more of the
same this coming week. The three posters presented both had a large focus on
the players behind the science, and who and what sides were being represented
(as did the previous background reports). The supporters of science have often
drawn controversy regarding their public relations. The recent debate regarding
GMO labeling is an excellent example of the poor public relations biotech
companies like Monsanto and Cargill exhibit. GMOs used in food production are
controversial for reasons we all know. The prevalence of this science means
that the public is going to be exposed to it. People have the right to know
what they are consuming and putting in their bodies. The biotech companies
possess a monopoly over the food industry and make the opaque qualities of
their business practices acceptable.
Some of the fears associated with
GMOs almost seem like a correlation between fears associated with the companies
that produce this frankenfood. Biotech companies are often thought of as
uncontrollable or mysterious. Not much is known about them, their business
practices, or even the real ingredients in their food. Stigmas that the
companies possess are projected onto the GMOs in their food. People become
worried and apprehensive of these organisms. Companies like Monsanto who
threaten to sue entire states like Vermont over mandating required labeling of
GMO products is likely to scare people away from the idea of GMOs. In reality,
people need to be educated and informed of the presence of GMOs in society.
Being on the ground breaking edge of science, people will need to realize that GMOs
still have a long way to come. Like with pesticides in the past, it is likely
that GMOs will be shown to have some negative effects. This is yet another
reason why GMO labeling is necessary. Personally, I believe that GMOs requiring
labels is actually advantageous in the battle for GMO acceptance.
The recent trend of organic is
familiar to most of us. Many people, however, do not know the actual definition
of what organic actually is. Recently there has been more information and
clarity on what organic consists of. The same process could be applied to GMFs.
Educating people on GMOs is the first and most necessary step.
I really enjoyed reading your post and also feel that a general lack of knowledge contributes to the aura of fear surrounding GMOs. My own skepticism of GMOs forced me to examine some of the sources that I frequently refer to to learn more about the subject. I have to admit that I rarely peruse scientific journals and instead gather a large amount of information from blog postings (probably not the most unbiased source...). I feel that individuals often seek out sources of information that confirm their existing beliefs ("see, I AM right!") instead of looking at both sides of the issue. I know that I have been guilty of this. If it were possible to provide a balanced array of information on GMOs (and many other topics for that matter), I feel that we would all benefit.
ReplyDelete